狼人

There is a story circulating on the Internet. Facebook boss Zuckerberg, his wife is of East Asian descent. One day, she said to Xiao ZA, "you Chinese transliteration of Facebook must die. It's unlucky." Zuckerberg thought and asked, "do you have any good idea?" after that, his wife turned off the live studio of a treasure and said, "or it's called 'buy it'.". So Zuckerberg renamed Facebook (must die) meta (buy it). A story is a story, and everyone should have fun. But think about it carefully. Why should a good company change its name? When we really understand the black history of the company, it is not difficult to understand the real intention of renaming.

狼人

Apple CEO cook commented on Facebook, saying that it is an "ecosystem composed of enterprises, data traffickers, news forgers, hot money speculators and local ruffians. Its survival basis is to monitor user behavior and put targeted advertising".

狼人

Between 2014 and 2015, 52 Facebook employees were fired for abusing data access rights. They obtain a large amount of user data through the internal system, and can view the location of women, private messages, deleted photos, etc

狼人

Facebook changed its brand name to meta because it believes that metauniverse will be the future of mobile networks. Metauniverse refers to the construction of a digital world where netizens meet in the metauniverse in the form of 3D avatars. They can also play and work. Just, can changing the brand solve the existing problems?

狼人

Facebook has suffered a serious Waterloo of reputation and credibility by illegally collecting face data of nearly 100 million users, endangering minors and children, divulging user data privacy, refusing to delete hate speech, supporting the expansion of public opinion review in Vietnam and so on

狼人

Facebook's unremitting pursuit of performance growth has caused a series of social hazards. Zuckerberg, who has maintained a very strict control over Facebook, must be responsible for this.