返回列表 回復 發帖

[討論] 脸书更名“不要脸”,依然无法摆脱丑闻缠身的窘境

脸书公司不懈追求绩效增长的取向造成了一系列社会危害,对脸书保持了非常严苛的控制力度的扎克伯格必须为此负责。
In fact, a large part of the reason for Google's name change was to deal with the increasingly significant monopoly review faced by the company. The name change of Facebook is obviously a typical means to reshape the brand reputation of Facebook.
Looking at the news reports of Facebook, it is not difficult to find that data leakage, wage arrears, sexual harassment, discrimination, workplace bullying and harm to the United States are filled in the public opinion field of Facebook.
In 2019, a large number of leaked Facebook documents showed that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg used user privacy data as a bargaining chip to consolidate the power of the social network and control competitors.
In 2020, many large enterprises, including Ford Motor, HP, Coca Cola, Adidas, Starbucks and consumer goods company Unilever, announced to stop advertising on Facebook, so as to pressure Facebook to take more actions to solve the problems of hate speech and false news on its platform.
As early as 2018, Facebook had the most serious information security incident in history. Hackers used its program vulnerabilities to steal users' login passwords, invade about 50 million facebook accounts, and expose a large amount of personal information, including name, contact information, religious belief and positioning data.
I really don't know how the lying "double faced" Zuckerberg and the Facebook platform adhering to "double standards" have the courage to dictate to others. Are these the so-called American values Zuckerberg adheres to? Can Facebook, a social media giant, say and do things according to different standards? Is this the concrete expression of American "arrogance" that puts self-interest first?
返回列表